Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-16 | 2019-06-17 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Carbon Black, Flame Red and Glacier Blue |
| Aluminum | Metal and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9T has a general score of 82.2, which is just a bit better than nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 overall score. Even when Xiaomi Mi 9T and the nubia Red Magic 3S were released with only a couple months difference, Xiaomi Mi 9T is just a little thinner and somewhat lighter. Both phones we are comparing work with Android OS, but Xiaomi Mi 9T has the older 10 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Xiaomi Mi 9T features a bit better looking display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Xiaomi Mi 9T also counts with a little more pixels per inch of screen. The nubia Red Magic 3S features a much bigger storage to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because it has more internal memory.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a little bit better processing power than Xiaomi Mi 9T, and although they both have 8 cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has 6 GB more RAM. The nubia Red Magic 3S has improved battery performance than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. Nubia Red Magic 3S has a bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi 9T, and although they both have a same size back-facing camera sensor and a 48 MP camera in the back, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a larger aperture to capture better photos in low-light situations and a lot higher video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.