Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-16 | 2019-08-20 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a global score of 82.7, which is just a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's overall score of 75.8. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro is a a little bit thinner and lighter phone than the nubia Red Magic 3S, even though they were only released with a couple months difference. These phones come with Android operating system, but Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has older 10 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has just a bit better performance than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has more RAM memory. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with a little bit better screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also counts with a just a bit greater pixel count in each inch of display.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro captures slightly better pictures and videos than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have a camera in the back with a 48 mega-pixels, a 0.5 inches sensor and the same (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also counts with better video frame rates.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has 256 GB internal storage. The nubia Red Magic 3S has longer battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has a 25% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.