Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 77.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-16 | 2016-05-17 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.81 x 3.48 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Cyber shade | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 344 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8956 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.18 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4850mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Max has a score of 77.5, which is a little bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's general score of 75.8. The Xiaomi Mi Max is an older cellphone than nubia Red Magic 3S, but Xiaomi managed to build it a little bit lighter and noticeably thinner. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Mi Max, because it has a little bit larger screen, a little bit higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little greater pixel amount per inch in the display.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features just a bit bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Mi Max, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a superior performance than Xiaomi Mi Max, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has 8 GB more RAM memory.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features a greater camera than Xiaomi Mi Max, because it has a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution, a bigger diafragm aperture and a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition. The nubia Red Magic 3S features a little longer battery performance than Xiaomi Mi Max, because it has a 3% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.