Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-16 | 2018-04-03 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Black and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 639.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a global score of 83.8, which is much better than nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 overall score. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is an older phone than nubia Red Magic 3S, but it's somewhat lighter and thinner anyway. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a bit faster CPU than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has 4 GB more RAM.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features a screen that is just as good as the screen in nubia Red Magic 3S, because although the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of display. The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a much better camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a much higher video quality, a bigger aperture to capture better low-light photos and videos, a much larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a much higher resolution back facing camera.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with as much storage to install applications and games as the nubia Red Magic 3S, both of them have the same internal storage. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a much longer battery life than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s costs a little more money than the nubia Red Magic 3S, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.