Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-16 | 2018-11-01 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Black, Blue and Green |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 is better than nubia Red Magic 3S, having an 83.8 score against 75.8. Even though the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 is older and a little bit heavier than nubia Red Magic 3S, it's design is still somewhat thinner. The nubia Red Magic 3S has a bit more powerful processor than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has more RAM memory.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 features a little more vivid display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also counts with a just a bit greater pixel number per display inch. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3's memory for games and applications is very similar to the nubia Red Magic 3S one, both have the same internal memory.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a much longer battery duration than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. The nubia Red Magic 3S features a much better camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has a back facing camera with a way better 48 mega pixels resolution, a larger diafragm aperture, a much bigger sensor and a lot better video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.