Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2024-07-19 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2488 x 2224 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 417 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5100mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 is better than nubia Red Magic 3S, getting a overall score of 84.3 against 75.8. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 is a a lot newer and noticeably thinner cellphone than the nubia Red Magic 3S, but it is just a bit heavier. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has an older 14 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with an incredibly better looking display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because it has a much higher resolution of 2224 x 2488, a bit more pixels per inch in the display and a bigger display. The nubia Red Magic 3S has a much better performing CPU than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4. Both have the same RAM memory amount and 8 processing cores.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with a slightly better camera than nubia Red Magic 3S, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture and the same video quality, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 also has a lot bigger camera sensor which offers a lot higher photo and video quality, better 24 fps video frame rates and a back camera with a better 50 mega-pixels resolution.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with as much memory to install applications and games as nubia Red Magic 3S, they have exactly the same 256 GB internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with a bit better battery life than nubia Red Magic 3S, because it has a 2% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.