Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-16 | 2019-11-20 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.21 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Aurora green, Glacier white and Midnight black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 377.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 13.09 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5260mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 has a global score of 83.7, which is much better than nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 general score. Both devices we are comparing here work with Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Mi Note 10 has older 10 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version. Xiaomi Mi Note 10 is a a bit lighter cellphone than nubia Red Magic 3S, but both of them are equally thin.
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 features a little bit better screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 also counts with a bit better pixel density. The nubia Red Magic 3S has a much greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Note 10, because it has 128 GB more internal memory.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a little better processing power than Xiaomi Mi Note 10, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a greater amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 counts with a superior camera than nubia Red Magic 3S, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and a same size camera aperture, the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 also has a camera in the back with way more mega-pixels, higher video frame rates and a lot larger sensor providing a much better image quality.
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 has just a little better battery performance than nubia Red Magic 3S, because it has 5260mAh of battery capacity against 5000mAh.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 is also by far the cheapest one, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.