Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a global score of 87.9, which is better than nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 general score. Even though Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro and the nubia Red Magic 3S were released only 7 months apart, Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro's design is just a little thinner but just a little heavier. Both phones we are comparing here have Android OS, but Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has an older 10 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features a little bit better processing power than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has 6 GB more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a bit more vivid display than nubia Red Magic 3S, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little bit better screen density.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro shoots a little bit better videos and photos than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low light photography and video, and they both have the same video quality, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also counts with higher 30 fps video frame rate, a bigger camera sensor shooting better quality photos and a much higher 64 megapixels resolution camera.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a lot bigger storage for apps and games than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. Nubia Red Magic 3S features a bit superior battery lifetime than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has a 6 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.