Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 12 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2022-06-23 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.43 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Moonlight Silver, Nebula Green and Night Black |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F4 is much better than nubia Red Magic 3S, getting an 87.5 score against 75.8. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Poco F4 has older 12 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie. Xiaomi Poco F4's construction is noticeably newer, way thinner and just a little lighter than the nubia Red Magic 3S.
The Xiaomi Poco F4 has a brighter display than nubia Red Magic 3S, and although they both have a same size display, the Xiaomi Poco F4 also has a just a little greater number of pixels in each inch in the display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. Nubia Red Magic 3S and Xiaomi Poco F4 feature quite similar processors, and although the Xiaomi Poco F4 has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Xiaomi Poco F4 and nubia Red Magic 3S both count with similar cameras, because although the Xiaomi Poco F4 has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for taking photographs and videos in low-light environments, and they both have a 0.5 inches sensor and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, it also counts with a camera with lot more megapixels and faster video frame rates.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a very superior memory capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Poco F4, because it has more internal memory capacity. Nubia Red Magic 3S features a little longer battery duration than Xiaomi Poco F4, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.