Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 78.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2020-07-14 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Green and Greener, Out of the Blue and Two Shades of Black |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro is slightly better than nubia Red Magic 3S, having a global score of 78.7 against 75.8. The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro is a newer device, and it is also just a bit thinner and a little bit lighter than the nubia Red Magic 3S. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has the previous 10 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a little faster processor than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a higher amount of RAM. The nubia Red Magic 3S features a slightly better looking screen than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, although it has a just a little worse count of pixels per inch of screen and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px, they both have a display of the same size.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a better memory capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro and nubia Red Magic 3S feature really similar batteries duration.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, and although they both have a back facing camera with a 48 megapixels resolution, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a larger camera aperture and a way higher video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.