Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2020-11-27 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Cool blue, Power black and Yellow |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco M3 has an overall score of 78.2, which is slightly better than nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 overall score. Both of these phones use Android OS, but Xiaomi Poco M3 has 10 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version. Xiaomi Poco M3 is a just a little bit lighter phone than nubia Red Magic 3S, but both are equally thin.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a bit superior CPU than Xiaomi Poco M3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Nubia Red Magic 3S has a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has a bit less pixels per display inch, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the nubia Red Magic 3S also counts with a little larger screen.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features a quite bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory. Xiaomi Poco M3 features improved battery lifetime than nubia Red Magic 3S, because it has a 6000mAh battery size.
The nubia Red Magic 3S takes much better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Poco M3, and although they both have the same sensor size and the same resolution back-facing camera, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a way better video resolution and a bigger aperture to capture better low light images.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Xiaomi Poco M3 is also a lot cheaper, which makes it very easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.