Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2020-02-11 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Atlantis blue, Matrix purple and Phoenix red |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco X2 has an overall score of 79.3, which is a bit better than nubia Red Magic 3S's global score of 75.8. These devices have Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Poco X2 has the previous 11 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie. Xiaomi Poco X2 is a a bit thinner and just a little lighter cellphone than the nubia Red Magic 3S, even when they were released only 4 months apart.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a little faster CPU than Xiaomi Poco X2, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has 6 GB more RAM memory. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a bit sharper display than Xiaomi Poco X2, although it has a bit lower display density and a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340, they both have a same size display.
The Xiaomi Poco X2 features a little bit better camera than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Xiaomi Poco X2 also counts with a lot more mega-pixels back-facing camera, higher 30 frames per second video frame rate and a bigger sensor which offers a higher image and video quality.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with much more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco X2, because it has 192 GB more internal storage. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a little better battery performance than Xiaomi Poco X2, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.