Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2020-09-08 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a global score of 81.6, which is just a bit better than nubia Red Magic 3S's global score of 75.8. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC construction has the same weight than nubia Red Magic 3S, but it is a bit thinner. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has older 10 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features a bit more powerful processor than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a bit more vivid display than nubia Red Magic 3S, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also has a bit greater pixel quantity per inch in the display and a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a bit better battery performance than nubia Red Magic 3S, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity instead of 5000mAh.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC captures a bit better videos and photos than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for taking pictures in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video quality, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a way better 64 MP resolution back-facing camera, better 30 fps video frame rate and a bigger sensor providing a better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.