Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2021-01-18 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi 9T has a global score of 78.2, which is a little bit better than nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 general score. Xiaomi Redmi 9T is a just a little lighter phone than nubia Red Magic 3S, but they are equally thin. These phones include Android OS, but Xiaomi Redmi 9T has an older 10 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a larger amount of RAM. Nubia Red Magic 3S has a slightly better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has a just a bit worse screen pixel density, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the nubia Red Magic 3S also counts with a little bigger display.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features a superior camera than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and although they both have a same size back camera sensor and the same resolution camera in the back, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a lot higher video quality and a larger diafragm aperture for better photography in low light environments.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a quite bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The Xiaomi Redmi 9T features better battery performance than nubia Red Magic 3S, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity against 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.