Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2021-05-26 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.37 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Aurora Green, Chrome Silver, Graphite Gray and Nighttime Blue |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 199.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A76 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Arm Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G has a general score of 79.5, which is slightly better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's score of 75.8. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G is a newer phone, and it is also lighter and just a little thinner than nubia Red Magic 3S. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G has 11 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with just a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has more RAM. Nubia Red Magic 3S and Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G both have really similar screens, because although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little higher display density and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a much bigger memory for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, because it has 192 GB more internal memory capacity. The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a greater camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, and although they both have the same sensor size and a back facing camera with a 48 mega-pixels, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a bigger aperture.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G and nubia Red Magic 3S feature very similar batteries duration.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G is not only the best devices of the ones we compare here, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.