Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-10-16 | 2018-11-23 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.22 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.42 ounces |
| Cyber shade | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has a score of 77.2, which is just a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 global score. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has 8.1 Oreo version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version. Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro's construction is somewhat thinner and lighter than nubia Red Magic 3S, although it was released around 11 months before.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a bit better CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a larger amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro features a bit better looking display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a bit smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels, it also counts with a little higher screen density.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Nubia Red Magic 3S shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because it has a way higher video definition, a lot higher resolution back-facing camera, a lot larger sensor providing a way better image quality and a bigger aperture for better photography in low light situations.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with better battery duration than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.