Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-16 | 2019-01-15 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.18 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 is slightly better than nubia Red Magic 3S, having a score of 80.3 against 75.8. Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 is an older cellphone than the nubia Red Magic 3S, but it is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 has a screen that's very similar to the nubia Red Magic 3S one, because although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a quite greater count of pixels per display inch.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a little bit better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Nubia Red Magic 3S takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, and although they both have the same sensor size and a 48 megapixels resolution camera in the back, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution and a larger diafragm aperture for better photography in low-light environments.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a little bit better memory to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with better battery performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.