Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a little bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3S, with a global score of 81.1 against 75.8. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a just a bit thinner and a bit lighter device than nubia Red Magic 3S, even when both were released with only a couple months difference. Both phones in this comparison include Android operating system, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has the previous 10 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a just a bit less pixels per inch of screen, they both have a screen with the same size. The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a bit superior CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with more memory capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a battery lifetime that is just as good as the nubia Red Magic 3S one, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has 5020mAh of battery capacity instead of 5000mAh.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a bit better camera than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a back camera with a way better 64 mega-pixels resolution and better video frame rates.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is not only the best devices in our comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.