Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-16 | 2020-02-07 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Black, Ochre and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The ZTE Axon 10s Pro is a bit better than nubia Red Magic 3S, with a 76.6 score against 75.8. ZTE Axon 10s Pro's construction is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than nubia Red Magic 3S, although both of them were released only 4 months apart. Both of these phones have the same Android 9.0 Pie operating system.
Nubia Red Magic 3S and ZTE Axon 10s Pro both count with incredibly similar displays, because although the ZTE Axon 10s Pro has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a just a little greater pixel number per inch in the display. The ZTE Axon 10s Pro has a better storage capacity for apps and games than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1000 GB.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a bit better hardware performance than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has more RAM. Nubia Red Magic 3S features a much better camera than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, a same resolution back facing camera and the same back camera sensor size, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a way higher video quality.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features improved battery performance than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because it has a 25 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.