Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-21 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Hot Rod red and Eclipse black | Black, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 579.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel has an overall score of 80.2, which is just a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 5G's 75.7 overall score. Google Pixel is an much older cellphone than the nubia Red Magic 5G, but it's a lot lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. Nubia Red Magic 5G features just a bit better looking display than Google Pixel, because although it has a just a bit worse display pixels density, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a way larger screen.
Nubia Red Magic 5G counts with a bit superior processor than Google Pixel, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a greater number of cores. Google Pixel counts with as much memory to install applications and games as nubia Red Magic 5G, both of them have equal internal memory. Nubia Red Magic 5G shoots much better pictures and videos than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the nubia Red Magic 5G also has a lot more megapixels back camera, better video frame rates, a much bigger sensor taking way higher quality videos and photographs and a larger aperture for better low light photos and videos.
Nubia Red Magic 5G features a much longer battery performance than Google Pixel, because it has a 62% larger battery capacity.
Google Pixel is not only the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.