Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-04-21 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Hot Rod red and Eclipse black | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 579.00 | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 385 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.5 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.32 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The HTC One M9 is just a bit better than nubia Red Magic 5G, with a 77.7 score against 75.7. HTC One M9's design has the same thickness than the nubia Red Magic 5G, but it is extremely lighter. Both of these phones have Android OS, but the HTC One M9 has 5.0 version while nubia Red Magic 5G has Android 10.
The HTC One M9 has a bit more powerful CPU than nubia Red Magic 5G, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64-bit CPU and a graphics co-processor. The HTC One M9 counts with a bit more vivid display than nubia Red Magic 5G, because although it has a way smaller screen and a little worse resolution of 1920 x 1080, it also counts with a just a little better pixels density.
The nubia Red Magic 5G captures way better photographs and videos than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same video quality, the nubia Red Magic 5G also has higher 60 fps video frame rates, a much better 64 megapixels resolution back camera, a lot bigger sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a larger diafragm aperture for better low light images and video.
Nubia Red Magic 5G counts with a way bigger memory capacity for applications and games than HTC One M9, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory. The nubia Red Magic 5G counts with a much longer battery life than HTC One M9, because it has a 58% bigger battery size.
The HTC One M9 is not only the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other devices, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.