Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-21 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Hot Rod red and Eclipse black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 579.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 385 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The HTC U Ultra is a little bit better than nubia Red Magic 5G, having a score of 77 against 75.7. HTC U Ultra is an older phone than the nubia Red Magic 5G, but it is a lot lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. Nubia Red Magic 5G counts with a bit more powerful processor than HTC U Ultra, because it has more cpu cores and a greater amount of RAM.
HTC U Ultra and nubia Red Magic 5G count with quite similar screens, because although the HTC U Ultra has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher count of pixels per inch of screen and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. The HTC U Ultra has a very superior storage to install games and applications than nubia Red Magic 5G, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB.
Nubia Red Magic 5G features a really longer battery life than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. Nubia Red Magic 5G has a way better camera than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have a same size aperture and the same (4K) video quality, the nubia Red Magic 5G also has a lot bigger camera sensor shooting way better quality photographs and videos, a lot more mega-pixels back camera and faster 60 fps video frame rates.
Although HTC U Ultra is a better device, it is more expensive than the nubia Red Magic 5G, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the nubia Red Magic 5G. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy nubia Red Magic 5G, giving up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.