Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-21 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Hot Rod red and Eclipse black | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 579.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is a bit better than nubia Red Magic 5G, getting a general score of 81.3 against 75.7. LG V35 ThinQ's construction is incredibly lighter and much thinner than nubia Red Magic 5G, even though it was released just a little further than a year before. LG V35 ThinQ has a bit better looking screen than nubia Red Magic 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a processing unit that's just as good as the nubia Red Magic 5G one, and although the LG V35 ThinQ has 2 GB less RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. The nubia Red Magic 5G counts with a much better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video quality, the nubia Red Magic 5G also counts with a way bigger camera sensor capturing lot higher quality photographs and videos, higher video frame rate and a lot higher 64 megapixels resolution back facing camera.
LG V35 ThinQ has a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than nubia Red Magic 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Nubia Red Magic 5G counts with improved battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 36% greater battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, LG V35 ThinQ is also by far the cheapest, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.