Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-04-21 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Hot Rod red and Eclipse black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 579.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto Z3 has a general score of 77.6, which is just a bit better than nubia Red Magic 5G's 75.7 overall score. The Moto Z3 construction is incredibly thinner and way lighter than nubia Red Magic 5G, despite of the fact that it was released about 20 months before. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS (Operating System), but the Moto Z3 has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and nubia Red Magic 5G has Android 10, providing the user some additional features.
The nubia Red Magic 5G counts with a bit sharper screen than Motorola Moto Z3, because although it has a just a little less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a little bit larger screen and a little bit higher 1080 x 2340 resolution. The nubia Red Magic 5G has a bit better processing unit than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Nubia Red Magic 5G captures much better photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the nubia Red Magic 5G also has a lot higher resolution back-facing camera, a larger diafragm aperture, faster video frame rate and a much bigger sensor capturing lot better quality photographs.
The Moto Z3 has a lot bigger storage for applications and games than nubia Red Magic 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB. Nubia Red Magic 5G has a much better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Motorola Moto Z3 is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.