Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-21 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Hot Rod red and Eclipse black | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 579.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Action is a bit better than nubia Red Magic 5G, having a score of 78.5 against 75.7. The Motorola One Action is a just a little thinner and lighter phone than the nubia Red Magic 5G, even when they were only released 8 months apart. The nubia Red Magic 5G has just a little better performance than Motorola One Action, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the nubia Red Magic 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The nubia Red Magic 5G has a little more vivid display than Motorola One Action, because although it has a little bit worse 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a bit less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a little bit larger display. Nubia Red Magic 5G has a lot better camera than Motorola One Action, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the nubia Red Magic 5G also has higher 60 fps video frame rate and a back facing camera with lot more MP.
Motorola One Action counts with a much better storage for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Motorola One Action also has an external memory slot that allows up to 1000 GB. Nubia Red Magic 5G has greater battery duration than Motorola One Action, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Motorola One Action is also a bargain compared to others, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.