Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-04-21 | -- |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Hot Rod red and Eclipse black | Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 579.00 | $ 230.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G68 MP2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.32 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A16 5G is a bit better than nubia Red Magic 5G, getting a general score of 76.2 against 75.7. The Galaxy A16 5G is a a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner cellphone than nubia Red Magic 5G. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the Galaxy A16 5G has 14 version while nubia Red Magic 5G has Android 10, providing you a couple nice extra features and performance enhancements.
The nubia Red Magic 5G counts with a much greater performance than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the nubia Red Magic 5G also has a higher amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy A16 5G counts with a little more vivid display than nubia Red Magic 5G, and although they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2340, the same display pixel density and a display with the same size, the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G also has a brighter display.
The nubia Red Magic 5G features a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, and although they both have a same size aperture, the nubia Red Magic 5G also has a camera in the back with lot more megapixels. The Samsung Galaxy A16 5G has a superior memory capacity to install games and applications than nubia Red Magic 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G also has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy A16 5G has just a little bit longer battery duration than nubia Red Magic 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, Samsung Galaxy A16 5G is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.