Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-21 | 2021-06-24 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Hot Rod red and Eclipse black | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 579.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.32 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has a global score of 84.6, which is better than nubia Red Magic 5G's global score of 75.7. The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G construction is newer, a bit thinner and a little lighter than the nubia Red Magic 5G. These devices use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has 11 version and nubia Red Magic 5G has Android 10 version.
The nubia Red Magic 5G has just a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a bit worse quantity of pixels per inch of screen and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a quite bigger display. The Galaxy A22 5G features a much better memory to install games and applications than nubia Red Magic 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
The nubia Red Magic 5G features a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Nubia Red Magic 5G captures much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the nubia Red Magic 5G also has a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels and a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
The Galaxy A22 5G features a bit superior battery performance than nubia Red Magic 5G, because it has an 11 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.