Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-04-21 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Hot Rod red and Eclipse black | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 579.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.32 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A25 5G is just a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 5G, getting a global score of 79.9 against 75.7. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy A25 5G has a newer 14 version while nubia Red Magic 5G has Android 10 version, providing a lot of extra features. Galaxy A25 5G is a much newer cellphone, and it's also somewhat thinner and just a bit lighter than the nubia Red Magic 5G.
Galaxy A25 5G counts with a little more vivid display than nubia Red Magic 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a really brighter screen and a quite greater pixels density. The nubia Red Magic 5G has a way better hardware performance than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the nubia Red Magic 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a superior memory capacity for applications and games than nubia Red Magic 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The nubia Red Magic 5G shoots better photos and videos than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the nubia Red Magic 5G also has a way better 64 MP resolution camera, a much larger back-facing camera sensor capturing lot higher quality videos and pictures and better video frame rate.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a bit superior battery duration than nubia Red Magic 5G, because it has an 11 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.