Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-21 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Hot Rod red and Eclipse black | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 579.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 is much better than the nubia Red Magic 5G, having a general score of 83.8 against 75.7. The Galaxy A50 is an older phone than nubia Red Magic 5G, but it is incredibly thinner and incredibly lighter anyway. The nubia Red Magic 5G has a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A50, because although it has a little bit worse pixels quantity per inch in the display, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, the nubia Red Magic 5G also counts with a little bigger screen.
The nubia Red Magic 5G has a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the nubia Red Magic 5G also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy A50 counts with a much bigger memory for apps and games than nubia Red Magic 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A50 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Nubia Red Magic 5G features a much better camera than Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for capturing images and/or video in low-light environments, it also counts with a way larger sensor providing a lot higher image quality, a much more megapixels back camera and a way higher 3840x2160 video quality.
The nubia Red Magic 5G counts with a little better battery duration than Galaxy A50, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Samsung Galaxy A50 is also a bargain compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.