Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-21 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Hot Rod red and Eclipse black | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 579.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50s is much better than the nubia Red Magic 5G, getting a general score of 86.6 against 75.7. Both of these phones include the same Android 10 OS. Even when the Galaxy A50s and the nubia Red Magic 5G were released only a couple of months apart, the Galaxy A50s is thinner and way lighter. The nubia Red Magic 5G features a little bit better looking display than Galaxy A50s, because although it has a just a little worse pixel amount per inch in the screen, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2340 resolution, the nubia Red Magic 5G also counts with a bit larger screen.
The nubia Red Magic 5G features a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 5G also has more RAM memory. Galaxy A50s has much more storage capacity for applications and games than nubia Red Magic 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A50s also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The nubia Red Magic 5G features just a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy A50s, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh. The nubia Red Magic 5G captures a little bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the nubia Red Magic 5G also has higher video frame rates, a bigger camera sensor taking better quality pictures, a lot more MP camera and a larger aperture for better low-light photography.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.