Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-21 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Hot Rod red and Eclipse black | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 579.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 has a general score of 90.7, which is much better than nubia Red Magic 5G's 75.7 score. The Galaxy A52 is a newer phone, and it's also somewhat lighter and thinner than nubia Red Magic 5G. The nubia Red Magic 5G counts with a little sharper display than Galaxy A52, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bit worse display pixels density, it also counts with a little bigger display.
Nubia Red Magic 5G counts with a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A52, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the nubia Red Magic 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy A52 has a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A52 also has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
Nubia Red Magic 5G shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A52, and although they both have a same size sensor, a same resolution back camera, the same aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the nubia Red Magic 5G also has better video frame rates. Samsung Galaxy A52's battery performance is just as good as nubia Red Magic 5G's battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.