Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-04-21 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Hot Rod red and Eclipse black | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 579.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G has a global score of 91.3, which is way better than the nubia Red Magic 5G's 75.7 general score. Galaxy A52 5G is a newer device, and it is also somewhat lighter and thinner than the nubia Red Magic 5G. Both phones we are comparing come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A52 5G has a newer 12 version and nubia Red Magic 5G has Android 10.
The nubia Red Magic 5G features a little faster processing unit than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have 8 cores, the nubia Red Magic 5G also has 2 GB more RAM. The nubia Red Magic 5G features a little bit better display than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a quite worse screen pixels density, it also counts with a bit bigger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a lot bigger storage for applications and games than nubia Red Magic 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a SD extension slot that admits up to 1 TB. The nubia Red Magic 5G has just a bit better camera than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have the same sensor size, a 64 mega pixels resolution camera, the same video definition and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the nubia Red Magic 5G also has faster 60 frames per second video frame rate.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a battery performance that's just as good as the battery performance in nubia Red Magic 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.