Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-04-21 | 2016-06-01 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.17 x 3.04 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Hot Rod red and Eclipse black | Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 579.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.32 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy C7 is a little bit better than nubia Red Magic 5G, having a 77.7 score against 75.7. The Galaxy C7 body is noticeably thinner and a lot lighter than nubia Red Magic 5G, even though it was released many years before. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy C7 has newer 8.0 Oreo version while nubia Red Magic 5G has Android 10.
The nubia Red Magic 5G counts with a little bit better screen than Galaxy C7, because although it has a little less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a larger screen and a slightly higher 1080 x 2340 resolution. The nubia Red Magic 5G counts with a little bit better storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy C7, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
Nubia Red Magic 5G features a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy C7, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the nubia Red Magic 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The nubia Red Magic 5G features greater battery lifetime than Galaxy C7, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
The nubia Red Magic 5G takes way better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy C7, because it has a way higher 3840x2160 video quality, a larger aperture to capture better low-light photography and video and a much better 64 mega pixels resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.