Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-21 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Hot Rod red and Eclipse black | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 579.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.32 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 has an overall score of 88.1, which is better than nubia Red Magic 5G's global score of 75.7. The Galaxy F62 construction weights the same than the nubia Red Magic 5G, but it's just a bit thinner. Both devices in our current comparison use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy F62 has the newer 11 version while nubia Red Magic 5G has Android 10, so it provides the user a couple additional features and better performance.
The nubia Red Magic 5G has a little bit better display than Galaxy F62, because although it has a little lower pixels density and a little lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, and they both have a same size display, the nubia Red Magic 5G also counts with more screen brightness. The Galaxy F62 has a much better storage for apps and games than nubia Red Magic 5G, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy F62 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
Nubia Red Magic 5G features a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy F62, because it has a greater number of faster cores and more RAM. The Galaxy F62 has a much better battery duration than nubia Red Magic 5G, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh. Nubia Red Magic 5G counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy F62, and although they both have a 64 mega-pixels resolution back camera, a same size back camera sensor, the same camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the nubia Red Magic 5G also has better 60 fps video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.