Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-21 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Hot Rod red and Eclipse black | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 579.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a general score of 98.9, which is much better than the nubia Red Magic 5G's global score of 75.7. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a somewhat thinner and a bit lighter phone than the nubia Red Magic 5G, although both of them were only released 4 months apart. These phones include Android OS, but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has the newer 13 version and nubia Red Magic 5G has Android 10.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit faster processing unit than nubia Red Magic 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 4 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit more vivid display than nubia Red Magic 5G, because it has a greater pixels amount in each inch in the display, a quite larger display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra shoots much clearer photos and videos than nubia Red Magic 5G, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a much better 7680x4320 video resolution, a back-facing camera with much more megapixels and a much larger sensor which offers a way better photo and video quality.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much greater storage to install games and applications than nubia Red Magic 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has an external memory card slot that admits up to 1000 GB. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra and nubia Red Magic 5G both count with very similar batteries performance.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra costs a lot more than nubia Red Magic 5G, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.