Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-04-21 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Hot Rod red and Eclipse black | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 579.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.5 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has a global score of 79.3, which is a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 5G's general score of 75.7. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has the previous 5.1 version while nubia Red Magic 5G has Android 10. Despite of the fact that Samsung Galaxy Note 5 is extremely older than the nubia Red Magic 5G, it's body is extremely thinner and a lot lighter.
The Galaxy Note 5 features a sharper screen than nubia Red Magic 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel quantity in each inch in the screen and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels. Nubia Red Magic 5G has a much better memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has more internal storage capacity.
The nubia Red Magic 5G features a greater processing power than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a larger number of cores and a larger amount of RAM. Nubia Red Magic 5G shoots way better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the nubia Red Magic 5G also has a much more MP back facing camera, a larger diafragm aperture, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and better 60 frames per second video frame rate.
Nubia Red Magic 5G features a much longer battery performance than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Galaxy Note 5 not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.