Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-21 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Hot Rod red and Eclipse black | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 579.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e has a general score of 86.3, which is better than nubia Red Magic 5G's overall score of 75.7. Despite of the fact that the Galaxy S10e is older than nubia Red Magic 5G, it's construction is much lighter and somewhat thinner. Nubia Red Magic 5G counts with a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a just a bit worse screen pixels density, it also counts with a larger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels.
The Galaxy S10e's processor is just as good as the nubia Red Magic 5G one, and although the Galaxy S10e has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Galaxy S10e has a superior memory capacity for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy S10e also has an external memory card slot that holds up to 512 GB.
Nubia Red Magic 5G has a much better battery duration than Galaxy S10e, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. Nubia Red Magic 5G counts with a way better camera than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low light images, and they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rates, the nubia Red Magic 5G also counts with a much bigger sensor taking way better quality pictures and a lot higher resolution back facing camera.
The Galaxy S10e not only is the best devices of the ones we compare here, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.