Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-04-21 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Hot Rod red and Eclipse black | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 579.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra is way better than nubia Red Magic 5G, getting a 95.4 score against 75.7. The Galaxy S22 Ultra design is newer and a little bit thinner, but a little bit heavier than nubia Red Magic 5G. These devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S22 Ultra has a more recent 13 version while nubia Red Magic 5G has Android 10 version, giving a couple nice extra features and some performance improvements.
The nubia Red Magic 5G has a bit better processing power than Galaxy S22 Ultra. Both have the same number of cores and a 8 GB RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a sharper screen than nubia Red Magic 5G, because it has a greater pixel density, a better 1440 x 3088 resolution, a way brighter screen and a little bit bigger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a better camera than nubia Red Magic 5G, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a much bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a lot higher video resolution and a much more mega pixels back camera.
Nubia Red Magic 5G and Galaxy S22 Ultra feature incredibly similar storage for applications, games, photos and videos, they have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy S22 Ultra features a little better battery duration than nubia Red Magic 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a lot more expensive than nubia Red Magic 5G, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.