Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-21 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Hot Rod red and Eclipse black | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 579.00 | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S7 is just a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 5G, with a 79.5 score against 75.7. Even though the Samsung Galaxy S7 is incredibly older than nubia Red Magic 5G, it's body is a lot lighter and somewhat thinner. Nubia Red Magic 5G has just a little better performance than Galaxy S7, because it has a higher amount of RAM and a greater number of faster cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 counts with a more vivid screen than nubia Red Magic 5G, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution, more screen brightness and a better pixels number in each display inch. The nubia Red Magic 5G captures way better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for taking photographs or videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the nubia Red Magic 5G also counts with better 60 fps video frame rate, a much more mega pixels camera and a way bigger sensor providing a much better image quality.
Nubia Red Magic 5G features a bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory. The nubia Red Magic 5G counts with a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a 50 percent bigger battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 not only is the best phones in our comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.