Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-21 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Hot Rod red and Eclipse black | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 579.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 Active is slightly better than nubia Red Magic 5G, with a 75.8 score against 75.7. Even though Galaxy S7 Active is noticeably older and just a little thicker than nubia Red Magic 5G, it's body is still lighter. The nubia Red Magic 5G features a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a larger amount of RAM and a greater number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy S7 Active has a little sharper screen than nubia Red Magic 5G, because although it has a way smaller screen and a little opaque screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher pixels density. The nubia Red Magic 5G features a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the nubia Red Magic 5G also counts with a camera with a way better resolution and faster video frame rate.
The nubia Red Magic 5G has a greater memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The nubia Red Magic 5G has just a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 13% bigger battery size.
Galaxy S7 Active not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.