Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-21 | 2021-03-12 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Hot Rod red and Eclipse black | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 579.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 311 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G52 MP1 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.32 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 has a global score of 78.1, which is slightly better than the nubia Red Magic 5G's global score of 75.7. Both of these devices have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 has newer 11 version while nubia Red Magic 5G has Android 10 version, providing a lot of extra features. Samsung Galaxy XCover 5's design is newer, just a little bit thinner and lighter than nubia Red Magic 5G.
The nubia Red Magic 5G has a more vivid display than Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a bigger display, a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a little higher display density. Galaxy XCover 5 counts with a much greater storage capacity to install games and applications than nubia Red Magic 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports up to 1 TB.
The nubia Red Magic 5G has just a bit better processing power than Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 5G also has more RAM memory. The nubia Red Magic 5G has a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the nubia Red Magic 5G also has a way more mega-pixels camera in the back and a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
The nubia Red Magic 5G features a way better battery duration than Galaxy XCover 5, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.