Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-04-21 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Hot Rod red and Eclipse black | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 579.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 385 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.32 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a score of 80.1, which is a bit better than nubia Red Magic 5G's general score of 75.7. Even being the best we are comparing here, Galaxy XCover FieldPro's body is somewhat heavier and way thicker than nubia Red Magic 5G. These phones work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy XCover FieldPro has the newer 8.0 Oreo version while nubia Red Magic 5G has Android 10 version.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a slightly better looking display than nubia Red Magic 5G, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a higher screen pixels density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. The nubia Red Magic 5G features a little bit better performance than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the nubia Red Magic 5G also has more RAM memory.
The nubia Red Magic 5G has a lot better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for capturing photos in low-light environments, it also counts with a much more mega pixels camera, a way bigger back camera sensor taking way better quality pictures and videos and a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a greater memory to install applications and games than nubia Red Magic 5G, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's battery performance is just as good as the nubia Red Magic 5G one.
Although Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than nubia Red Magic 5G, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as nubia Red Magic 5G. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy the nubia Red Magic 5G, and give up a couple features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.