Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-21 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Hot Rod red and Eclipse black | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 579.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is slightly better than nubia Red Magic 5G, having an 81 score against 75.7. Both devices in this comparison come with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has 11 version while nubia Red Magic 5G has Android 10 version. Even though Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a better device than the nubia Red Magic 5G, we must highlight that it's also just a bit heavier and a bit thicker.
The nubia Red Magic 5G features just a little better performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have 8 cores, the nubia Red Magic 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The nubia Red Magic 5G counts with a little more vivid screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a just a little inferior pixel amount per screen inch, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2340 resolution, the nubia Red Magic 5G also counts with a little bigger screen.
Nubia Red Magic 5G features a way better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low-light photos and video, it also counts with a much better resolution back camera, a much larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
The Galaxy XCover Pro features a greater memory to install games and applications than nubia Red Magic 5G, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The nubia Red Magic 5G has just a bit better battery life than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has an 11% larger battery capacity.
Galaxy XCover Pro not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.