Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-21 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Hot Rod red and Eclipse black | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 579.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is better than nubia Red Magic 5G, having an 88.5 score against 75.7. The Galaxy Z Flip is a much thinner and lighter cellphone than the nubia Red Magic 5G, although both of them were released with only a couple months difference. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Z Flip has newer 12 version while nubia Red Magic 5G has Android 10, providing you a couple nice extra features and performance tweaks.
Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit better hardware performance than nubia Red Magic 5G. Both have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core processing unit. Nubia Red Magic 5G counts with a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little less pixels per inch in the screen, they both have a screen of the same size.
The nubia Red Magic 5G counts with a way better camera than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the same 60 fps video frame rate and a same size aperture, the nubia Red Magic 5G also has a camera with a much higher resolution and a lot bigger camera sensor providing a much better image quality.
The Galaxy Z Flip features much more storage to store more games and applications than nubia Red Magic 5G, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity. The nubia Red Magic 5G features improved battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 36% larger battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip costs a lot more than the nubia Red Magic 5G, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.