Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-21 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Hot Rod red and Eclipse black | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 579.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.32 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a general score of 85.6, which is much better than the nubia Red Magic 5G's score of 75.7. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Flip 3 has 11 version and nubia Red Magic 5G has Android 10 version, so it gives you some nice extra features. Galaxy Z Flip 3's design is newer, notably thinner and lighter than the nubia Red Magic 5G.
Nubia Red Magic 5G features a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a quite lower display pixels density, they both have a display of the same size. Galaxy Z Flip 3 has as much storage to install games and applications as the nubia Red Magic 5G one, they have equal internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a processor that's just as good as the nubia Red Magic 5G one, both of them have 8 GB of RAM memory and 8 cores. Nubia Red Magic 5G captures much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the nubia Red Magic 5G also has a much higher resolution camera in the back.
Nubia Red Magic 5G counts with improved battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 is way more expensive than the nubia Red Magic 5G, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.