Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-21 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Hot Rod red and Eclipse black | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 579.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a lot better than the nubia Red Magic 5G, with a 92.3 score against 75.7. Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a lighter and extremely thinner cellphone than nubia Red Magic 5G, even though they were released with only a couple of months difference. Both phones in this review work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has newer 11 version while nubia Red Magic 5G has Android 10 version, providing the user a lot of extra features and some performance improvements.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit better processor than nubia Red Magic 5G. They have 8 GB of RAM and 8 CPU cores. The nubia Red Magic 5G has a little sharper display than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a just a bit worse display pixels density, they both have a display with the same size.
Nubia Red Magic 5G has a greater camera than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the same 60 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the nubia Red Magic 5G also has a lot larger camera sensor which gives a lot higher image and video quality and a way better 64 megapixels resolution camera in the back.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than nubia Red Magic 5G, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity. Nubia Red Magic 5G counts with greater battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G costs a bit more than nubia Red Magic 5G, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.