Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-21 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Hot Rod red and Eclipse black | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 579.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a lot better than nubia Red Magic 5G, with a general score of 94.6 against 75.7. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 and nubia Red Magic 5G were only released with a few months difference, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2's body is notably heavier but also way thinner than nubia Red Magic 5G. Both of these devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the newer 11 version and nubia Red Magic 5G has Android 10 version.
Nubia Red Magic 5G counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a bit smaller display and a lot worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a little greater pixels density. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has just a bit better performance than nubia Red Magic 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a higher amount of RAM.
Nubia Red Magic 5G captures better videos and photos than Galaxy Z Fold 2, and although they both have the same aperture, the same 60 frames per second video frame rates and the same video resolution, the nubia Red Magic 5G also has a lot higher resolution camera and a larger back-facing camera sensor shooting higher quality pictures and videos.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a lot bigger memory for apps and games than nubia Red Magic 5G, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a battery lifetime that's just as good as the nubia Red Magic 5G one.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is way more expensive than nubia Red Magic 5G, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.