Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-21 | 2020-12-21 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.78 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Hot Rod red and Eclipse black | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 579.00 | $ 449.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 389 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.32 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4220mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The ZTE Axon 20 has a general score of 77.8, which is a little bit better than the nubia Red Magic 5G's 75.7 general score. Even when ZTE Axon 20 and nubia Red Magic 5G were released with only a couple of months difference, ZTE Axon 20 is somewhat thinner and a little lighter. Both phones in this comparison review have the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't perceive any differences regarding that.
The nubia Red Magic 5G has just a bit better display than ZTE Axon 20, although it has a bit less pixels per display inch, a little bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a quite smaller screen. The nubia Red Magic 5G and the ZTE Axon 20 feature very similar memory to install applications and games, both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The nubia Red Magic 5G counts with a little better processing power than ZTE Axon 20. They have a Octa-Core processing unit and the same RAM memory amount. Nubia Red Magic 5G features a little better battery life than ZTE Axon 20, because it has a 7 percent more battery size. The ZTE Axon 20 counts with a camera that is just as good as the camera in nubia Red Magic 5G, and although the ZTE Axon 20 has a tinier aperture which is not nice for taking photos in low-light environments, they both have a 0.59 inches back-facing camera sensor, the same 3840x2160 video definition, the same 60 frames per second video frame rate and a same resolution back-facing camera.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the ZTE Axon 20 is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.