Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-02 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Sonic silver | Silver and Space gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 579.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone X has a global score of 88.1, which is much better than the nubia Red Magic 5S's global score of 76.2. The iPhone X design is notably thinner and incredibly lighter than the nubia Red Magic 5S, although it was released many years before. Apple iPhone X features a little better performance than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has 2 less and slower CPU cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
The iPhone X counts with a little sharper screen than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1125 x 2436, a bit brighter screen and a just a bit higher display pixels density. The iPhone X has a lot bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
Nubia Red Magic 5S captures much clearer pictures and videos than Apple iPhone X, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a much larger sensor taking lot better quality videos and photos, a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality and a way higher resolution back facing camera.
The nubia Red Magic 5S has a way better battery life than iPhone X, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 2716mAh.
IPhone X costs a lot more than the nubia Red Magic 5S, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.