Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | Android 5.1, 5.0 |
| 2020-09-02 | 2014-10-15 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.27 x 3.27 x 0.40 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Sonic silver | Blue and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 579.00 | $ 1019.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 490 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.5 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.32 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3220mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 330 hours standby time 24 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Nexus 6 is a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 5S, having an 81.1 score against 76.2. Even though the Google Nexus 6 is extremely older and just a little bit thicker than the nubia Red Magic 5S, it's body is still somewhat lighter. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Google Nexus 6 has the older 5.1 version and nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10 version.
Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a bit better hardware performance than Google Nexus 6, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM memory and more processing cores. The Google Nexus 6 has a little sharper display than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater display density and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels.
Nubia Red Magic 5S shoots much better pictures and videos than Google Nexus 6, because it has a bigger aperture for better low light photos and videos, a much higher video quality and a much better resolution back-facing camera. Nubia Red Magic 5S features a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Nexus 6, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a way better battery life than Google Nexus 6, because it has a 40 percent greater battery capacity.
Although Google Nexus 6 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the nubia Red Magic 5S, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the nubia Red Magic 5S. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy nubia Red Magic 5S, letting go a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.